Jon Ronson Declares ‘Woke Has Swapped Sides’: Navigating Cancel Culture and the Rise of the ‘Woke Right’

Investigative journalist and author Jon Ronson, renowned for his deep dives into the human psyche and societal quirks, is observing a significant shift in the cultural landscape of 2025. His latest commentary suggests that the concepts of “woke” and “cancel culture,” once largely associated with progressive movements, have undergone a dramatic transformation, with the very terms now seemingly wielded by opposing political factions.

The Evolving Meanings of ‘Woke’

Originally, the term “woke” emerged from African-American Vernacular English, signifying an awareness of racial prejudice and social injustice. It became a rallying cry, particularly within the Black community, for vigilance against systemic inequalities. As Ronson notes, this initial meaning, rooted in a call to “stay woke”, was later co-opted and weaponized by the political right. In contemporary discourse, “woke” has frequently been deployed as a pejorative to criticize individuals perceived as overly sensitive or as adhering to progressive orthodoxies.

Ronson argues that far from being “dead,” as some popular culture references suggest, the spirit of “woke” has indeed “swapped sides” in 2025. He posits that the political right, which previously criticized “cancel culture” and championed free speech, is now exhibiting behaviors akin to what they once condemned. This shift is evident in their intolerance for dissenting views and their active participation in public shaming and ostracization. The news cycle, particularly from sources like ITV News based in London, has been actively tracking these cultural and political trends.

Cancel Culture in a New Era

Coinciding with this semantic evolution is the complex phenomenon of “cancel culture.” While the term itself gained traction around 2018, the act of public shaming and ostracism has a much longer history. Ronson, an expert in public shaming from his book “So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed,” observes a notable change: people appear less fearful of being “canceled”. This perceived reduction in repercussions may be linked to the rise of platforms like X, formerly Twitter, now under Elon Musk’s ownership, which are seen as havens for expressing controversial opinions without significant backlash. The return of Donald Trump as US president is also seen by some as an indicator that in certain real-world spheres, consequences for controversial stances have diminished.

However, research suggests that while “cancel culture” is a trending topic of discussion, the actual behavior of “canceling” may not be as widespread as public perception or media coverage implies. Instead, online norms and a tendency to overperceive outrage can amplify these dynamics. Ronson’s insights highlight that while the mechanisms of public condemnation have evolved, the underlying human impulse to judge and ostracize remains a potent force in society.

The Persistent Shadow of ‘Psychopath Spotting’

Beyond the realm of cancel culture, Ronson revisits his long-standing fascination with “psychopath spotting.” His seminal work, “The Psychopath Test,” explored the concept of psychopathy and its potential influence within corporate and societal structures. In 2025, Ronson continues to examine the societal implications of identifying individuals with psychopathic traits, warning of the negative consequences when this “spotting” becomes a dominant societal activity. He has even humorously extended this critique to artificial intelligence, labeling AI chatbots like ChatGPT as “psychopaths” for their ability to mirror users, offer sycophantic responses, and show no remorse when caught in falsehoods. Ronson’s exploration of psychopathy serves as a reminder of the complexities in diagnosing and labeling individuals, cautioning against superficial judgments.

A Society in Flux

Jon Ronson’s observations paint a picture of a society grappling with shifting definitions, amplified online discourse, and the persistent allure of identifying perceived societal aberrations. The “woke” concept, once a call for awareness, has become a contested battleground. Cancel culture, while perhaps less feared, continues to shape public discourse and individual reputations. And the scrutiny of psychopathic traits, whether applied to human leaders or artificial intelligences, reflects a broader societal unease about authenticity, empathy, and control. As Ronson’s work consistently demonstrates, understanding these complex cultural currents is essential for navigating the challenges and opportunities of our increasingly interconnected world.